<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com//index.php">
        <title>glorum.com/tag/glorum</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/tag/glorum</link>
       <dc:date>2008-11-21T03:00:25+01:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/127"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/110"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/104"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/102"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/101"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/100"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/93"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/92"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/89"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/88"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/84"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/83"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/67"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/53"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/52"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/46"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/43"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/37"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/35"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/33"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/32"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/31"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/27"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/24"/>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/19"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/127">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-03-22T12:41:16+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>[made with glorum] Una Receta DOT com</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/127</link>
        <description>http://www.unareceta.com</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/110">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-02-07T02:15:17+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>Missing search</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/110</link>
        <description>The tags/keywords navigation isn't always useful. For example, if one wants to return to a previously seen message, it's not.

This will maybe become more visible as the number of messages slowly grows (they are less than 100 now).

There probably needs to be a search field. 

It is not obvious how to inject it into the current interface without creating more problems (confusion) than benefits.

The confusion would maybe come from a conflict with the existing names/keywords fields in the</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/104">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-01-12T02:16:40+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>Glorum Negative Feedback</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/104</link>
        <description>Exclusively negative feedback about glorum is appreciated.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/102">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-01-09T19:17:45+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>I don't quite understand this</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/102</link>
        <description>Mario Rizzuti introduced me to this. Is this like a blackboard? I definitely like the interface. Needs a little bit more love though.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/101">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-01-09T14:03:37+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>glorum ratings</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/101</link>
        <description>The recent glorum update included a new way to track and use the +/- feedback data. 

The previous approach was as simple as 

1) count how many + and - an item received 
2) check for a limit
3) limit reached? delete the item

The system was able to slowly delete the few spam posts received in the past few weeks. It was, actually even sophisticated for current glorum levels of traffic.

But an approach of that type is weak, at least. I think it would be unrealistic to believe it could </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/100">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-01-08T09:16:47+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>glorum update in 20 minutes</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/100</link>
        <description>a new version is going to be installed in a few minutes. More details in a bit.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/93">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-01-05T04:04:48+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>Download or SaaS?</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/93</link>
        <description>What are your plans for Glorum? I'd love to trial it for team discussions, but to do that I'd need a private Glorum. Are you planning to run it for people like 37 Signals' Basecamp? Or can I download and install it?

I'd love to try it out...

</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/92">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-12-22T12:59:52+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>[links] About glorum</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/92</link>
        <description>http://thinkingandmaking.com/entries/226/</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/89">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-12-13T15:10:33+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>keywords / tags</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/89</link>
        <description>I think this is my post number 4.


I see the initial poster can set tags, but no tags on the reply. so if my reply changes slightly (or completely) the topic, how can I make this reflected in the tags?

also how does glorum handle synonimous tags (I am trying to put two of them in the tags line now)?

Yuv</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/88">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-12-13T15:04:55+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>first experience</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/88</link>
        <description>I'm here because I am critical of web based forums and am looking to see if this can and will replace them. my feedback will be based on this being critical. the intention is to express positive criticism.

the number one reason why i do not use web based forums is the user interface. I am reading dozens of mailing lists and if each of them had a different user interface, with different colors, placement, etc., I would go crazy.

it would be nice if I could read and write to glorum from my t</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/84">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-11-30T11:54:42+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>your new @user layout</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/84</link>
        <description>Your user page now has a slightly different layout (see http://www.glorum.com/user/isabel ) which is another step in making it some kind of casual/effortless &quot;blog&quot;. Ideas are more than welcome.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/83">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-11-29T04:44:24+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>&quot;replies&quot; or &quot;comments&quot;?</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/83</link>
        <description>I was just wondering if &quot;comments&quot; is not a better label than the current &quot;replies&quot;. </description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/67">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-11-05T04:09:26+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>bug? user tags</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/67</link>
        <description>The 3 tags below each username in the left menu look stale. They don't get refreshed if the user posts with new tags. Is it a bug?</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/53">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-25T09:18:16+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>RSS for a thread</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/53</link>
        <description>A nice feature would be to allow the subscription to a thread with RSS.  Enabling anyone that is interested in only one thread to subscribe to just that thread instead of a tag which would bring in multiple threads.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/52">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-24T17:55:25+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>What is Glorum</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/52</link>
        <description>Glorum is an online environment where *every topic* can be discussed.

You could visualize this as a mess of unrelated messages. Not. Every topic has its own dedicated space within glorum. 

No matter how specialized your topic is, there is right now a dedicated space within glorum that is exclusively about that niche.

Ex:

http://www.glorum.com/tag/tokyo (or any other place)
http://www.glorum.com/tag/java (or any other programming language)
http://www.glorum.com/tag/chess (or any oth</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/46">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-20T11:45:04+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>Glorum BETA online in 1 hour</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/46</link>
        <description>A new version of glorum is going to be installed right now. Current data will not be lost.

The new version includes some new ideas, an improved layout/interface and a few fixes.

The most important introduction is that you now have a dual (modular) navigation, by user and by tag. That's the main news.

Another nice thing is that as people interact with glorum, they get tagged. It now shows 3 tags under each username. 

Ideally, this would give me an idea about what kind of messages I am</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/43">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-14T16:57:03+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>Glorum development: update  - Oct 15</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/43</link>
        <description>I have just fixed a few bugs and have been experimenting with a couple of changes to glorum.  

I would like to find a second criteria for surfing messages. Basically have 2 menus instead of 1: the existing topics/tags on the right and another menu on the left. Ideally I could use both menus at the same time.

In the next few days I will post something about this, with some screens, if possible.

If anyone can think of any alternative way of surfing messages that is not the current topics/</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/37">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-10T09:31:47+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>can't view commands list (glorum/&gt;help)</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/37</link>
        <description>I type 'help' to view the lists of commands available but it shows an error.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/35">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-09T16:42:56+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>Email from .id?</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/35</link>
        <description>I tried to sign up using email from ngoprek.web.id but rejected. Then after sign up using my gmail, i tried to change my account info using my ngoprek.web.id email, still rejected. Is .id domain rejected by glorum?</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/33">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-09T13:22:53+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>glorum at ZefHemel.com</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/33</link>
        <description> http://www.zefhemel.com/archives/2006/10/07/the-state-of-the-tag-board

</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/32">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-07T23:40:12+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>BBCode and Emoticons</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/32</link>
        <description>I think that a couple of cool new features would be BBCode and Emoticons. So you can spice up posts a bit, or something. :P That's my opinion, anyways...</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/31">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-06T16:11:51+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>why replies don't have their own tags too</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/31</link>
        <description>I was thinking that replies should come with tags too. Many times a thread can start as a topic and morph into other topics.</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/27">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-06T09:45:47+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>(link) glorum at Library clips</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/27</link>
        <description>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/10/06/glorum-qa-tags</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/24">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-10-04T10:04:39+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>suggestion</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/24</link>
        <description>It would be nicer if, when you type something in the input box it would redirect you to the real url of that page.

Ex: 
@blitz currently sends me to http://www.glorum.com/cl/goto/?cl=@blitz. 

I think that being redirected to http://www.glorum.com/user/blitz would be much better (ie. for bookmarking).</description>
    </item>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/19">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2006-09-30T17:39:48+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>RSS now available</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/19</link>
        <description>There are now 2 feeds you can add to your aggregator.

homepage
http://www.glorum.com/rss

tag feed
http://www.glorum.com/rss/tag/&lt;TAG&gt;

user feed
http://www.glorum.com/rss/user/&lt;USERNAME&gt;/&lt;optional:TAG&gt;</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
