<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com//index.php">
        <title>glorum.com/user/Glorum_Golem/suggestions</title>
        <description></description>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/user/Glorum_Golem/suggestions</link>
       <dc:date>2009-01-06T01:30:18+01:00</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.glorum.com/view/125"/>
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    <item rdf:about="http://www.glorum.com/view/125">
        <dc:format>text/html</dc:format>
        <dc:date>2007-03-05T11:37:28+01:00</dc:date>
        <dc:source>http://www.glorum.com</dc:source>
        <title>Suggestions</title>
        <link>http://www.glorum.com/view/125</link>
        <description>The following are all forward thinking...software's probably not ready to discuss any of the following yet, but I thought I'd suggest them to offer some ways high-volume forums might want to be able to use this softtware. I've run very high volume forums since 1988, FWIW.

1. Option for other users (and/or admin) to be able to edit a posting's tags

2. create groups of users who can/can't vote...but leave interface identical for both (i.e., deactivate actual results of voting for troublemake</description>
    </item>
</rdf:RDF>
