110
 
  mario (36)
  glorum features
  Glorum_Golem (1)
  suggestions
  troels (0)
  no keywords


mario 212091 years ago
Missing search
The tags/keywords navigation isn't always useful. For example, if one wants to return to a previously seen message, it's not.

This will maybe become more visible as the number of messages slowly grows (they are less than 100 now).

There probably needs to be a search field.

It is not obvious how to inject it into the current interface without creating more problems (confusion) than benefits.

The confusion would maybe come from a conflict with the existing names/keywords fields in the black/blue rectangles. How to differentiate the search field(s) from them is not very clear. Just a 'search' button?

mario 210359 years ago:
There also should be some way to quote messages. Someone was suggesting this a while ago.

Maybe the ability to edit (and probably delete) one's own messages.

mario 210358 years ago:
Rating should return to be clickable by any visitor without requiring login.

I think that replies should really be called comment and should be available without requiring a registration, too.

mario 210350 years ago:
It lacks an 'about' page and a tagline. As a wannabe model, it's probably a luxury that could be avoided.

The current interface would probably benefit from a bunch of extra wording.

mario 210346 years ago:
There could be a few alternative interfaces.
We are talking about very similar alternatives with different colors and styles but having in common the basic interface game.
I think it could be interesting seeing it pretending to be a forum, a wiki and a mailing list archive. Maybe others.

troels 198805 years ago:
edit ones own post - at least for a certain period of time - would be a real improvement

mario 197857 years ago:
Just done for posts. I hope to extend this to comments/replies today.

Glorum_Golem 197229 years ago:
Don't add quote-back. Consensus in cutting-edge not geeky forums is not to use it. Here's some reasons why (there are others):

1. It gets kludgy as discussions go re:re:re:re:

2. customer service pressures 'cuz newbies never know understand how to do it

3. just about gotta rely on javascript, and it'll be browser compatibility nightmare

4. if, per my suggestion, you add threading (i.e. add "reply" button to each posting in a thread, and, after posting, show who's replying to whom), it's easy enough to trace context.

5. you've got this voting system to purge bad stuff. But...bad stuff will live on forever via quoteback (this is a very very serious concern in hi-traffic forums...again, I've run huge ones).

Glorum_Golem 197228 years ago:
----
"Rating should return to be clickable by any visitor without requiring login. "
-----
Am i understanding correctly that you're in favor of letting guests vote? If so, PLEASE don't. Major gaming.



-----
I think that replies should really be called comment and should be available without requiring a registration, too.
-----
You're envisioning a bloggy system, where it's all about the OP. The majority of forums don't work this way, though. Especially in large forums, where there's acculteration, you get community spirit which results in back-and-forth and digression within threads.


re: interfaces, that's good stuff. But maybe get the core stuff figured out first, though? Otherwise the tail could wind up wagging the dog. E.g. the idea of super-tagging (to create a hybrid tag/conventional forum) could affect this greatly.

Glorum_Golem 197226 years ago:
Per the issue of blogginess, I keep wishing that the homepage scroll would show me last poster to a thread rather than OP.

E.g., if it takes you a month to reply to stuff (just ribbing you), it'd be nice to see at a glance when you've pitched back into a topic. I keep seeing your name there and figure you've chimed in.....

mario 197069 years ago:
I am just in favor of letting guests vote on glorum.com (currently a very low-volume implementation; it also has a purpose as a demo).

I don't expect it to be an option for an active forum.

Glorum_Golem 197038 years ago:
Ok, gotcha. FWIW all my remarks are skewed to active forum consideration

 
  glorum (54)
  design (26)
  features (13)
  usability (5)
  interface (4)
 


© 2006-2007 glorum.com